Behavioural evidence on COVID-19 vaccine uptake.

OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organization has declared that COVID-19 is no longer a public health emergency of international concern. Nevertheless, it remains a public health issue, and seasonal vaccinations, at the same time of year as influenza vaccinations, will be necessary. When the first vaccines were administered in 2020, decision-makers had to make assumptions about the best methods to communicate and administer vaccines to increase uptake. Now, a body of evidence can inform these decisions. STUDY DESIGN: A narrative review written by three behavioural scientists who design research for policy. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for: (i) reviews of interventions to increase uptake of COVID-19 or influenza vaccines and (ii) empirical studies on uptake of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. In addition, registered trials gathered by a Cochrane scoping review of interventions to increase uptake of COVID-19 vaccines were searched for updated results. RESULTS: Results centre around two aspects of a vaccination campaign of interest to policymakers: communication and administration. Results suggest that communications highlighting the personal benefits of vaccination are likely to be more effective than those highlighting collective benefits. The efficacy of vaccination may be underestimated and stressing efficacy as a strong personal benefit may increase uptake. Keeping vaccines free, sending personalised messages, reminders and prebooked appointment times may also increase uptake. CONCLUSIONS: There is now a body of evidence from behavioural science that suggests how vaccination campaigns for COVID-19 can be structured to increase uptake. These recommendations may be useful to policymakers considering seasonal vaccination campaigns and to researchers generating hypotheses for country-specific trials.

Specialist Palliative Care and Dementia: Staff Challenges and Learning Needs.

Objective: This study explored the perspectives of specialist palliative care (SPC) teams in Ireland, in relation to personal learning needs and education regarding dementia care. Methods: This mixed-methods study involved a survey and focus group. SPC staff were recruited through a professional palliative care society and via hospices in 4 regions. Survey items included challenges in clinical care, personal learning needs, and preferred modes of educational delivery. Quantitative data analysis was descriptive; open-answer survey questions and the focus group transcript underwent thematic analysis. Results: In total, 76 staff completed surveys and rated the following as most challenging: timely access to community agency and specialist support; and managing the needs of people with dementia (PwD). Respondents volunteered additional challenges around the timing/duration of SPC involvement, prognostication, and inadequate knowledge of local services. Staff ranked learning needs as highest in: nonpharmacological management of noncognitive and cognitive symptoms; differentiation of dementia subtypes; and pharmacological management of cognitive symptoms. The focus group (n = 4) gave deeper perspectives on these topics. Overall, 79.2% of staff preferred formal presentations by dementia-care specialists and 76.6% preferred e-learning. Conclusion: Several dementia-care challenges and learning needs are identified by SPC staff, as above. These can inform the design and delivery of tailored education programs for SPC staff. There is also a need for closer working between dementia services and SPC services to provide integrated, holistic care for PwD. One aspect of achieving this is greater awareness of local dementia-care services among SPC staff, and vice versa.

Public misperceptions of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and waning: experimental evidence from Ireland.

OBJECTIVES: The study set out to measure public understanding of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) and how effectiveness wanes with time since vaccination. Because perceived VE is a strong predictor of vaccine uptake, measuring perceptions can inform public health policy and communications. STUDY DESIGN: Online randomised experiment. METHODS: The study was undertaken in Ireland, which has high vaccination rates. A nationally representative sample (n = 2000) responded to a scenario designed to measure perceptions of COVID-19 VE against mortality. The length of time since vaccination in the scenario was randomly varied across four treatment arms (2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months). RESULTS: The public underestimates VE, with substantial variation in perceptions. A majority (57%) gave responses implying perceived VE against mortality of 0-85%, i.e., below scientific estimates. Among this group, mean perceived VE was just 49%. Over a quarter (26%) gave responses implying perceived VE greater than 95%, i.e., above scientific estimates. Comparing the four treatment groups, responses took no account of vaccine waning. Perceived VE was actually higher 9 months after vaccination than 2 weeks after vaccination. CONCLUSION: Despite high vaccination rates, most of the public in Ireland underestimates VE. Furthermore, the general public has not absorbed the concept of vaccine waning in the months following vaccination. Both misperceptions may reduce vaccine uptake, unless public health authorities act to correct them through improved communication.

Approaches to co-production of research in care homes: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Using the technique of co-production to develop research is considered good practice. Co-production involves the public, practitioners and academics working together as equals throughout a research project. Co-production may help develop alternative ways of delivering care for older adults that are acceptable to those who live and work in care homes. However, guidance about applying co-production approaches in this context is lacking. This scoping review aims to map co-production approaches used in care homes for older adults in previous research to support the inclusion of residents and care staff as equal collaborators in future studies. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Seven electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed primary studies using co-production approaches in care home settings for older adults. Studies were independently screened against eligibility criteria by two reviewers. Citation searching was completed. Data relating to study characteristics, co-production approaches used, including any barriers and facilitators, was charted by one reviewer and checked by another. Data was summarised using tables and diagrams with an accompanying narrative description. A collaborator group of care home and health service representatives were involved in the interpretation of the findings from their perspectives. RESULTS: 19 studies were selected for inclusion. A diverse range of approaches to co-production and engaging key stakeholders in care home settings were identified. 11 studies reported barriers and 13 reported facilitators affecting the co-production process. Barriers and facilitators to building relationships and achieving inclusive, equitable and reciprocal co-production were identified in alignment with the five NIHR principles. Practical considerations were also identified as potential barriers and facilitators. CONCLUSION: The components of co-production approaches, barriers and facilitators identified should inform the design of future research using co-production approaches in care homes. Future studies should be explicit in reporting what is meant by co-production, the methods used to support co-production, and steps taken to enact the principles of co-production. Sharing of key learning is required to support this field to develop. Evaluation of co-production approaches, including participants' experiences of taking part in co-production processes, are areas for future research in care home settings.

Co-production involves people from different backgrounds working together as equals throughout a research project. Co-production may be a useful approach to help ensure that research in care homes focuses on approaches that are important and agreeable to older people and staff. A wide range of research and guidance about co-production has been published but there is limited guidance about how to do co-production in care homes. We carried out a review that involved pulling together previous research that used co-production in care homes for older adults. We looked at published research studies to learn about: Key components of the strategies used to achieve co-production, How care home residents and care home staff were involved, What helped or made co-production difficult to achieve. A collaborator group including representatives from care homes and healthcare services were involved in this research. They helped decide what was most important about the results.We found 19 published research articles that used co-production in care homes. The strategies used in the articles differed. There were also differences in how care home residents and staff were involved in co-production. Factors that helped people involved to work together in an inclusive and equal way were identified. At the same time, there were also many challenges.These results should be used to design future research using co-production in care homes. Future studies should clearly report what is meant by co-production, the strategies used and key learning points. Evaluation of co-production and the experiences of people involved is needed.

Implementation fidelity of the Falls Management Exercise Programme: a mixed methods analysis using a conceptual framework for implementation fidelity.

OBJECTIVES: Falls in older adults cause significant morbidity and mortality and incur cost to health and care services. The Falls Management Exercise (FaME) programme is a 24-week intervention for older adults that, in clinical trials, improves balance and functional strength and leads to fewer falls. Similar but more modest outcomes have been found when FaME is delivered in routine practice. Understanding the degree to which the programme is delivered with fidelity is important if 'real-world' delivery of FaME is to achieve the same magnitude of outcome as in clinical trials. The objective of this study was to examine the implementation fidelity of FaME when delivered in the community to inform quality improvement strategies that maximise programme effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN: A mixed methods implementation study of FaME programme delivery. METHODS: Data from programme registers, expert observations of FaME classes, and semistructured interviews with FaME instructors were triangulated using a conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: In total, 356 participants enrolled on 29 FaME programmes, and 143 (40%) participants completed at least 75% of the classes within a programme. Observations showed that 72%-78% of programme content was delivered, and 80%-84% quality criteria were met. Important content that was most often left out included home exercises, Tai Chi moves, and floor work, whereas quality items most frequently missed out included asking about falls in the previous week, following up attendance absence and explaining the purpose of exercises. Only 24% of class participants made the expected strength training progression. Interviews with FaME instructors helped explain why elements of programme content and quality were not delivered. Strategies for improving FaME delivery were established and helped to maintain quality and fidelity. CONCLUSIONS: FaME programmes delivered in the 'real world' can be implemented with a high degree of fidelity, although important deviations were found. Facilitation strategies could be used to further improve programme fidelity and maximise participant outcomes.

Dementia palliative care: A multi-site survey of long term care STAFF'S education needs and readiness to change.

Many people with dementia reside in long-term care, where limited staff knowledge of dementia palliative care has been identified, along with poor awareness that a palliative approach can assist in identifying unmet care needs. Evidence-based guidance in palliative care for people with dementia is available however, implementing this guidance requires staff engagement and a tailored educational approach. This pre-implementation situational analysis informed a tailored staff education intervention to support the implementation of national guidance on dementia palliative care in long term care. Using a cross-sectional study design, underpinned by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, survey data were collected on site profile, staff demographics, learning needs, and readiness-to change at three residential care sites for older people in Ireland. In total, 69 staff (predominantly nurses and healthcare attendants) completed the surveys. Medication management and management of pain were the most frequently identified learning needs. Staff were confident in their ability to implement change but de-motivation and powerlessness were substantial factors as only one-third of staff were "ready for change". Staffing levels, managing risk during change and perceived reluctance in others were common barriers. These results informed an educational intervention to address the specific care context, staff learning needs and barriers to change prior to implementation.

Potentially modifiable determinants of malnutrition in older adults: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Malnutrition in older adults results in significant personal, social, and economic burden. To combat this complex, multifactorial issue, evidence-based knowledge is needed on the modifiable determinants of malnutrition. Systematic reviews of prospective studies are lacking in this area; therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to investigate the modifiable determinants of malnutrition in older adults. METHODS: A systematic approach was taken to conduct this review. Eight databases were searched. Prospective cohort studies with participants of a mean age of 65 years or over were included. Studies were required to measure at least one determinant at baseline and malnutrition as outcome at follow-up. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Pooling of data in a meta-analysis was not possible therefore the findings of each study were synthesized narratively. A descriptive synthesis of studies was used to present results due the heterogeneity of population source and setting, definitions of determinants and outcomes. Consistency of findings was assessed using the schema: strong evidence, moderate evidence, low evidence, and conflicting evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in the final review. Thirty potentially modifiable determinants across seven domains (oral, psychosocial, medication and care, health, physical function, lifestyle, eating) were included. The majority of studies had a high risk of bias and were of a low quality. There is moderate evidence that hospitalisation, eating dependency, poor self-perceived health, poor physical function and poor appetite are determinants of malnutrition. Moderate evidence suggests that chewing difficulties, mouth pain, gum issues co-morbidity, visual and hearing impairments, smoking status, alcohol consumption and physical activity levels, complaints about taste of food and specific nutrient intake are not determinants of malnutrition. There is low evidence that loss of interest in life, access to meals and wheels, and modified texture diets are determinants of malnutrition. Furthermore, there is low evidence that psychological distress, anxiety, loneliness, access to transport and wellbeing, hunger and thirst are not determinants of malnutrition. There appears to be conflicting evidence that dental status, swallowing, cognitive function, depression, residential status, medication intake and/or polypharmacy, constipation, periodontal disease are determinants of malnutrition. CONCLUSION: There are multiple potentially modifiable determinants of malnutrition however strong robust evidence is lacking for the majority of determinants. Better prospective cohort studies are required. With an increasingly ageing population, targeting modifiable factors will be crucial to the effective treatment and prevention of malnutrition.

'Around the edges': using behaviour change techniques to characterise a multilevel implementation strategy for a fall prevention programme.

BACKGROUND: Implementation strategies are needed to ensure that evidence-based healthcare interventions are adopted successfully. However, strategies are generally poorly described and those used in everyday practice are seldom reported formally or fully understood. Characterising the active ingredients of existing strategies is necessary to test and refine implementation. We examined whether an implementation strategy, delivered across multiple settings targeting different stakeholders to support a fall prevention programme, could be characterised using the Behaviour Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy. METHODS: Data sources included project plans, promotional material, interviews with a purposive sample of stakeholders involved in the strategy's design and delivery and observations of staff training and information meetings. Data were analysed using TIDieR to describe the strategy and determine the levels at which it operated (organisational, professional, patient). The BCT Taxonomy identified BCTs which were mapped to intervention functions. Data were coded by three researchers and finalised through consensus. RESULTS: We analysed 22 documents, 6 interviews and 4 observation sessions. Overall, 21 out a possible 93 BCTs were identified across the three levels. At an organisational level, identifiable techniques tended to be broadly defined; the most common BCT was restructuring the social environment. While some activities were intended to encourage implementation, they did not have an immediate behavioural target and could not be coded using BCTs. The largest number and variety of BCTs were used at the professional level to target the multidisciplinary teams delivering the programme and professionals referring to the programme. The main BCTs targeting the multidisciplinary team were instruction on how to perform the (assessment) behaviour and demonstration of (assessment) behaviour; the main BCT targeting referrers was adding objects to the environment. At the patient level, few BCTs were used to target attendance. CONCLUSION: In this study, several behaviour change techniques were evident at the individual professional level; however, fewer techniques were identifiable at an organisational level. The BCT Taxonomy was useful for describing components of a multilevel implementation strategy that specifically target behaviour change. To fully and completely describe an implementation strategy, including components that involve organisational or systems level change, other frameworks may be needed.

Malnutrition in Hospitalised Older Adults: A Multicentre Observational Study of Prevalence, Associations and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in older adults and is associated with high costs and adverse outcomes. The prevalence, predictors and outcomes of malnutrition on admission to hospital are not clear for this population. DESIGN: Prospective Cohort Study. SETTING: Six hospital sites (five public, one private). PARTICIPANTS: In total, 606 older adults aged 70+ were included. All elective and acute admissions to any speciality were eligible. Day-case admissions and those moribund on admission were excluded. MEASUREMENTS: Socio-demographic and clinical data, including nutritional status (Mini-Nutritional Assessment - short form), was collected within 36 hours of admission. Outcome data was collected prospectively on length of stay, in-hospital mortality and new institutionalisation. RESULTS: The mean age was 79.7; 51% were female; 29% were elective admissions; 67% were admitted to a medical specialty. Nutrition scores were available for 602/606; 37% had a 'normal' status, 45% were 'at-risk', and 18% were 'malnourished'. Malnutrition was more common in females, acute admissions, older patients and those who were widowed/ separated. Dementia, functional dependency, comorbidity and frailty independently predicted a) malnutrition and b) being at-risk of malnutrition, compared to normal status (p < .001). Malnutrition was associated with outcomes including an increased length of stay (p < .001), new institutionalisation (p =<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the prioritisation of nutritional screening in clinical practice and public health policy, for all patients ≥70 on admission to hospital, and in particular for people with dementia, increased functional dependency and/or multi-morbidity, and those who are frail.

Five short screening tests in the detection of prevalent delirium: diagnostic accuracy and performance in different neurocognitive subgroups.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is prevalent and serious, yet remains under-recognised. Systematic screening could improve detection; however, consensus is lacking as to the best approach. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of five simple cognitive tests in delirium screening: six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT), clock-drawing test, spatial span forwards, months of the year backwards (MOTYB) and intersecting pentagons (IPT). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. Within 36 h of admission, older medical patients were assessed for delirium using the Revised Delirium Rating Scale. They also underwent testing using the five cognitive tests outlined above. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV; NPV) were calculated for each method. Where appropriate, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was also calculated. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy patients were included, and 184 had delirium. Of the tests scored on a scale, the 6-CIT had the highest AUC (0.876), the optimum cut-off for delirium screening being 8/9 (sensitivity 89.9%, specificity 62.7%, NPV 91.2%, PPV 59.2%). The MOTYB, scored in a binary fashion, also performed well (sensitivity 84.6%, specificity 58.4%, NPV 87.4%, PPV 52.8). On discriminant analysis, 6-CIT was the only test to discriminate between patients with delirium and those with dementia (without delirium), Wilks' Lambda = 0.748, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The 6-CIT measures attention, temporal orientation and short-term memory and shows promise as a delirium screening test. This study suggests that it may also have potential in distinguishing the cognitive impairment of delirium from that of dementia in older patients. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Walking in hospital is associated with a shorter length of stay in older medical inpatients.

Evidence suggests that inactivity during a hospital stay is associated with poor health outcomes in older medical inpatients. We aimed to estimate the associations of average daily step-count (walking) in hospital with physical performance and length of stay in this population. Medical in-patients aged ⩾65 years, premorbidly mobile, with an anticipated length of stay ⩾3 d, were recruited. Measurements included average daily step-count, continuously recorded until discharge, or for a maximum of 7 d (Stepwatch Activity Monitor); co-morbidity (CIRS-G); frailty (SHARE F-I); and baseline and end-of-study physical performance (short physical performance battery). Linear regression models were used to estimate associations between step-count and end-of-study physical performance or length of stay. Length of stay was log transformed in the first model, and step-count was log transformed in both models. Similar models were used to adjust for potential confounders. Data from 154 patients (mean 77 years, SD 7.4) were analysed. The unadjusted models estimated for each unit increase in the natural log of step-count, the natural log of length of stay decreased by 0.18 (95% CI -0.27 to -0.09). After adjustment of potential confounders, while the strength of the inverse association was attenuated, it remained significant (ß log(steps) = -0.15, 95%CI -0.26 to -0.03). The back-transformed result suggested that a 50% increase in step-count was associated with a 6% shorter length of stay. There was no apparent association between step-count and end-of-study physical performance once baseline physical performance was adjusted for. The results indicate that step-count is independently associated with hospital length of stay, and merits further investigation.

Barriers to investigating and reporting nosocomial outbreaks to health authorities in São Paulo, Brazil: a mixed methods approach.

BACKGROUND: Not all nosocomial outbreaks (NOs) are reported to health authorities (HAs). AIM: To identify barriers to investigating and reporting NOs to HAs. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was performed with a convergent parallel design. The quantitative and qualitative branches of the study were a statewide (electronic) survey and focus groups (FGs), respectively. Infection control practitioners (ICPs) working in the State of São Paulo, Brazil were recruited. FINDINGS: Eighty-five ICPs were enrolled in the survey and 22 ICPs were enrolled in the FGs. Barriers to investigating and reporting NOs included: (i) difficulty in translating outbreak investigation knowledge into practice; (ii) weak planning in outbreak investigation process; (iii) organizational culture and context; (iv) lack of awareness about reporting; and (v) lack of autonomy of ICPs to report outbreaks to HAs. CONCLUSION: HAs could overcome these barriers by revising their strategies to work with healthcare services, as well as delivering translational educational programmes to support improvement in knowledge and skills for NO investigation.

Antipsychotic prescription amongst hospitalized patients with dementia.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic drugs are used to treat behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, despite significant safety concerns regarding increased risk of stroke and mortality. The numbers of patients with dementia and related behavioural symptoms being treated in acute hospitals is increasing. AIM: (i) to determine pre-admission and in-hospital prevalence of antipsychotic use in a national sample of patients with dementia and acute illness; (ii) identify reasons for antipsychotic use; (iii) assess features of the ward environment which impact on patients with dementia; (iv) determine availability of dementia-specific policies, training, appraisal and mentorship programs which influence service delivery. DESIGN AND METHODS: Four-part standardized audit in 35 public acute hospitals comprising (i) retrospective healthcare record review (n = 660); (ii) prospective assessment of ward environment (n = 77); (iii) ward organization interview with clinical managers (n = 77); (iv) hospital organisation interview with senior managers (n = 35). RESULTS: Antipsychotic drugs were prescribed to 29% of patients with dementia before hospitalization and to 41% during hospitalization; one quarter received new or additional prescriptions. Assessments for delirium (45%), dementia symptoms (39%), mood (26%), mental state (64%) and distress-provoking factors (3%) were suboptimal. Drug indications were documented in 78%. Non-pharmacological interventions were not documented. Most wards lacked environmental cues to promote orientation. Dementia-specific care pathways existed in 2 of 35 hospitals. Staff support and training programmes were suboptimal. 12% of patients were discharged with new antipsychotic prescriptions. CONCLUSION: Antipsychotic medications are commonly prescribed for hospitalized patients with dementia in Ireland. Ward environments and dementia-related governance structures are suboptimal.

Frequency of delirium and subsyndromal delirium in an adult acute hospital population.

Background The frequency of full syndromal and subsyndromal delirium is understudied. Aims We conducted a point prevalence study in a general hospital. Method Possible delirium identified by testing for inattention was evaluated regarding delirium status (full/subsyndromal delirium) using categorical (Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), DSM-IV) and dimensional (Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R98) scores) methods. Results In total 162 of 311 patients (52%) screened positive for inattention. Delirium was diagnosed in 55 patients (17.7%) using DSM-IV, 52 (16.7%) using CAM and 58 (18.6%) using DRS-R98⩾12 with concordance for 38 (12.2%) individuals. Subsyndromal delirium was identified in 24 patients (7.7%) using a DRS-R98 score of 7-11 and 41 (13.2%) using 2/4 CAM criteria. Subsyndromal delirium with inattention (v. without) had greater disturbance of multiple delirium symptoms. Conclusions The point prevalence of delirium and subsyndromal delirium was 25%. There was modest concordance between DRS-R98, DSM-IV and CAM delirium diagnoses. Inattention should be central to subsyndromal delirium definitions.

Development of an abbreviated version of the delirium motor subtyping scale (DMSS-4).

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric syndrome with considerable heterogeneity in clinical profile. Identification of clinical subtypes can allow for more targeted clinical and research efforts. We sought to develop a brief method for clinical subtyping in clinical and research settings. METHODS: A multi-site database, including motor symptom assessments conducted in 487 patients from palliative care, adult and old age consultation-liaison psychiatry services was used to document motor activity disturbances as per the Delirium Motor Checklist (DMC). Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify the class structure underpinning DMC data and also items for a brief subtyping scale. The concordance of the abbreviated scale was then compared with the original Delirium Motor Subtype Scale (DMSS) in 375 patients having delirium as per the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (4th edition) criteria. RESULTS: Latent class analysis identified four classes that corresponded closely with the four recognized motor subtypes of delirium. Further, LCA of items (n = 15) that loaded >60% to the model identified four features that reliably identified the classes/subtypes, and these were combined as a brief motor subtyping scale (DMSS-4). There was good concordance for subtype attribution between the original DMSS and the DMSS-4 (κ = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: The DMSS-4 allows for rapid assessment of clinical subtypes in delirium and has high concordance with the longer and well-validated DMSS. More consistent clinical subtyping in delirium can facilitate better delirium management and more focused research effort.

The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol is a poor predictor of in-hospital mortality.

BACKGROUND: The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) proposes admission criteria based only on physiological and laboratory parameters and has recently informed an Irish national bed utilisation review. Severity of illness tools can be poorly predictive of outcomes, particularly in older patients. AIMS: To assess the clinical utility of the AEP in moribund older and younger patients. METHODS: The study was conducted in four acute hospitals in South Munster, Ireland, and was of retrospective analytical cohort study design. The Hospital In-Patient Enquiry Scheme was used to ascertain patients who died within 10 days of hospital admission, over a 2-year period. Proximate death was used as a robust measure of validity of admission. Emergency department (ED) records were screened retrospectively to allocate the AEP criteria. RESULTS: There were 803 eligible in-hospital deaths. Establishment of AEP criteria was available in 72.9 % (585 patients, 50.8 % female). The median length of stay until death was 4 days. Just over 30 % (179/585) of patients did not meet AEP criteria, two-fifths (72/179) of whom had been coded as severely unwell on arrival to the ED. There was no significant difference in AEP identification rates between older and younger age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study illustrates that the AEP is a poor predictor of mortality in all age groups, having failed to identify approximately one-third of our cohort. Based on our findings, we feel that this tool should not be used to assess the appropriateness of admission.

The potential lost hospital income from miscoded emergency department boarders in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) boarders, namely patients who have been admitted under an in-patient service but remain on a trolley in the ED, have long been a problem in the Irish healthcare system. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all ED boarders in Cork University Hospital (CUH) for a 6-month period from January to July 2011. Data were obtained from the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry Office (HIPE). The income generated by the hospital for a subset of these patients (January and February attendances) was obtained from the Finance Office in the hospital, based on diagnoses as recorded on the HIPE system. A convenience sample of two-thirds of the 39 acute hospitals nationally was surveyed to ascertain whether ED boarders were coded by individual HIPE offices as hospital in-patients or as ED attendees. RESULTS: A total of 806 patients were admitted to an in-patient service from January to July 2011 in CUH and subsequently discharged, having completed their entire stay in the ED. The income generated by a sub-sample of 228 patients (January and February ED boarders) was determined. The hospital was remunerated by 685,111 for these patients, i.e. an average income of 3,098 per patient. Only 8 hospitals of the 27 surveyed hospitals coded overnight ED Boarders as in-patients and were thus able to request income for these patients appropriately. CONCLUSION: Discrepancies in coding of ED boarders may result in significant revenue losses for certain hospitals.

Delirium: a key challenge for perioperative care.

Delirium is highly prevalent, occurring in 20% of acute hospital inpatients and up to 62% of surgical patients. It is a significant predictor of poor outcomes including mortality and institutionalisation, however it is often viewed as simply a marker of underlying illness and is frequently overlooked in older adults. Although delirium is commonly comorbid with dementia, it represents a more urgent diagnosis, requiring prompt intervention. Delirium presents most commonly with hypoactive features (e.g. withdrawal and reduced spontaneous movement and speech). The common stereotype of hyperactive delirium tremens (e.g. agitation, hallucinations), although more visible, is less common. All presentations share acute disimprovement of cognitive function. Delirium is a highly predictable and preventable occurrence, however a major barrier to improving delirium care and impacting upon outcomes is that it remains poorly detected, particularly in surgical populations and especially in patients with hypoactive presentations. Routine ward-based screening for delirium, particularly in high-risk populations, and improved staff awareness of the significance of the problem can improve detection rates. Preventative strategies, particularly multicomponent approaches, have been most efficacious in improving patient outcomes. Optimising perioperative risk factors can lead to reduced incidence. Appropriate treatment of delirium requires thorough investigation, management of the underlying illness, avoidance of complications and simplification of the care environment. Studies suggest a role for pharmacological prophylaxis, particularly in relation to anaesthetic and sedative agents used intra- and post-operatively. Furthermore, gathering evidence suggests that judicious use of antipsychotic medications may be helpful in delirium prevention and treatment.

An update on traumatic brain injuries.

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a major cause of neurological mortality and morbidity throughout the world. Several challenges have been faced in the conduct of clinical research in TBI in past decades, including inclusion of a broad heterogeneity of injuries, difficulties with standardization and consistency of complex medical management, and lack of sophisticated outcomes measures to sufficiently detect differences in outcomes. Consequently, evidence-based guidelines for targeted therapeutic approaches remain for the most part at the level of Class II or III evidence. Harnessing the power of computing is paramount to our understanding of different prognostic groups in order to devise treatments of the future. Multimodality bedside monitoring of various physiological parameters and events can be deployed in the intensive care unit (ICU) but better data repositories and analytics are required. Recent developments in neuroimaging and definition of potential genetic and biological markers in TBI are also aiding in the sub-categorization of patients into finer diagnostic and prognostic groups. Using mathematical prediction models incorporating the plethora of data gathered, future research will provide means of tailoring therapies to individuals based upon best evidence in populations similar to them, and according to their own biological and physiological situation.